"Neil Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, dblink is simply calling SRF_RETURN_DONE() when the current
> context is the multi-call memory context.
So I see.
> We could outlaw that
> practice, but that risks breaking out-of-tree SRFs that do something
> similar.
No, they're already broken; this is just making the breakage more
obvious. It is not kosher for a SQL-callable function to return with
a different current context than it was called in.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
