HANDLE h = (HANDLE)_beginthreadex(NULL, 0, thread_start, arg, 0, NULL);
This didn't give me any more joy, unfortunately. But you're right, I
should be using it.
Are these threads sharing memory, intentionally or by mistake?
if(h)
CloseHandle(h);
Umm, even if I wait on the handle using waitForMultipleObjects() ?
I was only trying to demonstrate that the value returned by _beginthread can be
managed/closed just like any other win32 HANDLE.
> I am terminating the thread by returning from the thread function. I
> understand this is the recommended way.
I didn't see a CloseHandle on ret_child anywhere. The HANDLE still exists after
the thread exists, you still have to call CloseHandle.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
