Would it be reasonable to turn of optimization for this file? Ken
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 05:47:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:23:06 -0500 >> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> >> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> writes: >>> Guess what! with the fprintf .. descending node... in place, everything >>> goes well. The optimizer definitly does something weird along the >>> definition/assignement of leftok/rightok.. >> >> Hmm, so the problem is in that second loop. The trick is to pick some >> reasonably non-ugly code change that makes the problem go away. >> >> The first thing I'd try is to get rid of the overly cute optimization >> >> int rightnodeno = leftnodeno + 1; >> >> and make it just read >> >> int rightnodeno = rightchild(nodeno); >> >> If that doesn't work, we might try refactoring the code enough to get >> rid of the goto, but that looks a little bit tedious. >> >> regards, tom lane >> > I tried that and moving leftok,rightok declaration outside the loop, and > refactor the assignement code of leftok, rightok . nothing worked! > > Regards, > -- > Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) > 15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) > 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) > FRANCE Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery) > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
