Do we really need this kind of discussion here?
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Sreejesh O S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Dmitry Turin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, Pgsql-hackers. >> >> We would like to obtain your opinion on these two questions: >> >> >> 1) We wanna append possibilities into Postgres engine, and wanna get top >> estimation for >> size of code, cost and time of implementation. >> 1.1) We divide possibilities to elementary features, find analogues in >> already written >> code, and suppose e.g., that quantity of lines for 'create timer' will be >> similar to >> 'create function', and that implementation for 'create timer' is easy than >> implementation >> of 'create function' (because it already has prototype in 'create >> function', and coping >> source code is possiblle) >> 1.2) We calculate cost and time by COCOMO >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocomo >> >> How relevant is this estimation ? >> >> >> 2) We are captivated by price of Indians, >> we listened much about low quality of code, written by Indians, > > How do you identify that the code written by Indians is low in quality ? Do > you subcontracted to an Indian company or so ? >> >> we are fearing, that American company will resale implementation to Indian >> subcontractor >> (i.e. real developers will be Indians anyway). >> >> >> What requirements should satisfy code, written by Indians, to be in next >> version of Postgres ? >> >> >> >> Dmitry (SQL50, HTML60) >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > > -- Ibrar Ahmed EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers