On Friday 19 December 2008 19:36:42 Simon Riggs wrote: > Perhaps we should listen to the people that have said they don't want > queries cancelled, even if the alternative is inconsistent answers. That > is easily possible yet is not currently an option. Plus we have the > option I referred to up thread, which is to defer query cancel until the > query reads a modified data block. I'm OK with implementing either of > those, as non-default options. Do we need those options or are we ok? >
Haven't seen any feed back on this, but I think the two options of cancel query for replay, and pause replay for queries, are probably enough for a first go around (especially if you can get the query canceling to work only when changes are made to the specific database in question) -- Robert Treat Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net Consulting: http://www.omniti.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
