On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:19:56AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:25:47AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I think a simplistic solution is to declare the variable volatile.
> >> Would you test that and report back?
> 
> > Yes, making oldcontext volatile makes the test pass.
> 
> This is a gcc bug and you should report it.  Since the variable is
> not assigned within the try-block, volatile marking should not be
> necessary.

Reported as:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38660


kurt


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to