On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 01:25:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: > > 2008/12/31 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>: > >> Maybe we could have a separate function which returned the info > >> in various columns (OUT params). Maybe it would be useful to > >> normalize the info as reported the buildfarm, which right now is > >> a bit ad-hoc. > > > All should be GUC read only variables - It is cheep. > > Not as cheap as a single added function. If we need to provide > these fields broken out --- and no one has demonstrated any need to > do so --- then I'd support Alvaro's suggestion.
+1 for broken-out fields in columns per Alvaro. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
