On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 01:25:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <[email protected]> writes:
> > 2008/12/31 Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>:
> >> Maybe we could have a separate function which returned the info
> >> in various columns (OUT params).  Maybe it would be useful to
> >> normalize the info as reported the buildfarm, which right now is
> >> a bit ad-hoc.
> 
> > All should be GUC read only variables - It is cheep.
> 
> Not as cheap as a single added function.  If we need to provide
> these fields broken out --- and no one has demonstrated any need to
> do so --- then I'd support Alvaro's suggestion.

+1 for broken-out fields in columns per Alvaro.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: [email protected]

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to