Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 18:49:00 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > If people have further updates please, please send them (with subject
> > headings please).
> 
> Most of the entries are quite frankly junk, either already committed, already 
> rejected, patches not under consideration, irrelevant discussions, or 
> completely silly, e.g.,
> 
> 261. Warning about the 8.4 release

That was the same reaction Tom had.  Again, many might be junk, but is
it 100% junk.  What about:

        8.4 - psql output for \l
        Overriding Kerberos parameters
        HAVE_FSEEKO for WIN32
        stat() vs cygwin
        Memory mess introduced by recent funcapi.c patch
        The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly
        So what's an "empty" array anyway?

I just picked those at random.  And again, though they are not required
for the release, they appeared during 8.4 development and should be
fixed now, if possible.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to