Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Isn't this redundant given the existence of pglesslog? > > > It does the same as pglesslog, but is simpler to use because it is > > automatic. > > Which also means that everyone pays the performance penalty whether > they get any benefit or not. The point of the external solution > is to do the work only in installations that get some benefit. > We've been over this ground before...
If there is a performance penalty, you are right, but if the zeroing is done as part of the archiving, it seems near zero cost enough to do it all the time, no? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
