Tom Lane wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > > Greg Smith <gsm...@gregsmith.com> wrote: > >> I thought at one point that the direction this was going toward was to > >> provide the size of the WAL file as a parameter you can use in the > >> archive_command: > > > Hard to beat for performance. I thought there was some technical > > snag. > > Yeah: the archiver process doesn't have that information available.
OK, thanks, I understand now. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
