> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We could try going the other way, attaching URL's to the TODO items so
> > people can get more information about an existing bug.
>
> That might be worth doing, but I think it's mostly orthogonal to the
> question of a bug database. The set of problems that are (still) on the
> TODO list is just a small fraction of the set of bugs that someone might
> look in a bug database for --- anything that's already fixed in current
> sources is probably not going to be on TODO, if it ever got there at
> all (which easily-fixed problems do not).
That is a good point. I remove items after we make a release, and we
don't record quickly fixed items. I wonder if I should keep the HISTORY
file updated more frequently so people can see what has been fixed from
the previous release.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
