Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some of the discussions could go on for weeks. Are you saying that
> wading thru a few hundred posts to find out what a solution was is
> better than a quick searchable summary?
Given a threaded index, you aren't wading through "a few hundred posts".
Agreed, a nice canned database entry might be easier to look at, but
who's going to expend the time to maintain the database? Unless someone
actively takes responsibility for keeping the DB up to date, it'll be
junk. So far I heard Philip say he'd be willing to check over some
fraction of the existing entries, but I don't hear anyone wanting to
take it on as a long-term commitment.
> You need to ask yourself how many bugs wouldn't be reported if it
> was harder to report them.
Who said anything about making it harder to report them? The webform
feeding into pgsql-bugs is just fine with me. Seems to me the
discussion here is about how we keep track of the results of pgsql-bugs
activity.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
