> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > Can someone point me to a bug that is _not_ on the TODO list?
> 
> Just looking through pgsql-bugs of the last two weeks, the following all
> look reasonable.
> 
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00088.html
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00084.html
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00078.html
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00089.html
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00086.html
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00042.html
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00036.html
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00035.html
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00012.html

Yes, these are all valid bugs that the TODO list didn't capture.  Good
point.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Reply via email to