On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 23:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > > FWIW, I'll comment that what we're seeing here is nothing new.
> Meanwhile it's emerging that the selinux people don't feel qualified to > review it either. I'm not quite sure what to do about that. But "throw > it in there on faith" doesn't sound like an appealing answer, and I've > got no idea how long it will take to work out a non-faith-based answer. > O.k. maybe it is time to consider something non-traditional. What about two 8.4 releases? 8.4-stable 8.4-experimental stable is everything that stable is. PostgreSQL at its best. experimental is the day after we branch. Same catalog version but contains say SEPostgres and Hot Standby etc... 8.4-experimental gives people a stable same version compatible version to test at their leisure. We support it until 8.5 comes out. At 8.5, those features are merged (or ripped out) into 8.5-stable. Yes I know this is non-standard for our community but maybe it is time to crank it up a notch? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
