On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: >> So, some feedback to make this decision more difficult: > >> Users: care about HS more than anything else in the world. > > I don't think this is correct. There are certainly a lot of users who > would like an in-core replication solution, but HS by itself is not that > --- you also need (near) real-time log shipping, which we have already > decided to punt to 8.5. That being the case, I think the argument > that HS is a must-have feature for 8.4 is actually rather weak.
I don't buy that. Sure, sync-rep would be the icing on the cake, but HS with a small archive_timeout (even of the order of 10 or 15 minutes) would have been extremely useful on a number of systems I used to run. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
