Alvaro Herrera escreveu: >> IIRC, my last patch includes a partial validation code for RESET cases. For >> example, the last SQL will not be atomic (invalid reloption silently >> ignored). >> So, why not apply the namespace validation code to RESET case too? Patch is >> attached too. > > No, we must not validate the options passed to RESET, because we want to > be able to reset even options that we do not currently think that are > valid. Consider that we might be trying to clean up after options set > by a previous version of a module. > Ah, idea withdrawn. But we should at least document this behavior.
-- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
