Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> writes:
> I was thinking that we could sidestep the whole port number question if
> we didn't try to start up postmaster, and used a stand-alone backend (
> postgres --single) instead.
That would be a good place to get to eventually, but I think it'd be
a serious error to be expending development effort on the point right
now. We need a *working* migrator; simplifying its use can come later.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
