Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Chernow <a...@esilo.com> writes:
Also, this definition feels a bit wrong --- it's not possible for
all four cases to be valid, is it?

Yes it is.

PQinitSSLExtended(0, 0); // don't init anything, PQinitSSL(0)
PQinitSSLExtended(1, 0); // init ssl, don't init crypto
PQinitSSLExtended(0, 1); // don't init ssl, init crypto
PQinitSSLExtended(1, 1); // init both, default behavior, PQinitSSL(1)

I know what you're thinking the flags should mean, I'm saying that it's
not possible for the third case to be sane.  It implies that the
application initialized ssl but not crypto, which isn't possible.


Or that the application called PQinitSSLExtended(0, 1) and then initialized SSL itself, which is sane.

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to