Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> vacuum analyze doesn't unfreeze pg_class. It could create unfrozen
>> tuples in pg_statistic, perhaps, but we could easily fix that by
>> truncating pg_statistic afterwards (its not like there will be useful
>> data there...)
> I have added --analyze to the vacuumdb command and documented its
> purpose.
Surely that's backwards? What's the point of doing analyze work you'll
have to throw away?
>> The end goal is going to be to have all this work happen in a standalone
>> backend,
> Any idea how to do that?
I didn't say it was easy.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
