> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In trying to decide how to keep ODBC compilable standalone, I can't
> > figure out how to get md5.c in there from backend/libpq.
> 
> AFAIK ODBC hasn't been compilable standalone for awhile; doesn't it
> depend on our toplevel configure script now?

The Unix version is not compilable on its own, but I see no code in
win32.mak that refers to upper directories.

> 
> > Is it crazy to
> > put md5.c in interfaces/odbc and symlink it from there to backend/libpq
> > and interfaces/libpq?
> 
> YES, that's crazy.  If you think ODBC should build separately, then give
> it its own copy of md5.c.  But please first check that your assumption
> is still valid.

And I will just throw a note at the top of each mentioning they should
be identical.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Reply via email to