On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 08:22:52AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Joshua, in the tests that you've been running, did you have to rig the > > planner with "enable_mergjoin=off" or similar, to get the queries to use > > hash joins? > > I didn't have to fiddle anything, but Josh's tests were more exhaustive.
The planner chose hash joins for the queries I was running, regardless of whether the patch was applied. I didn't have to mess with any settings to get hash joins. - Josh
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
