Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm okay with removing this for 8.4, but I think it's too late to
change the behavior of 8.3.
It's never too late to fix a bug.
When the proposed fix involves breaking cases that used to behave
usefully, you need a much stronger argument than that.
What I have proposed for 8.3 should not break a single case that
currently behaves usefully. If anyone has a counter-example please show it.
What I have proposed for 8.4 possibly would break current "useful"
behaviour (FSVO "useful"), but should be done anyway on correctness grounds.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
