> Regarding the licencing of the code, I always release my code under GPL, > which is the licence I prefer, but my code in the backend is obviously > released under the original postgres licence. Since the module is loaded > dynamically and not linked into the backend I don't see a problem here. > If the licence becomes a problem I can easily change it, but I prefer the > GPL if possible. We just wanted to make sure the backend changes were not under the GPL. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
- [HACKERS] RE: User locks code Lincoln Yeoh
- RE: [HACKERS] User locks code Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] User locks code Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] User locks code Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] User locks code Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Massimo Dal Zotto
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Ross J. Reedstrom
- RE: [HACKERS] User locks code Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] User locks code Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Massimo Dal Zotto
- Re: [HACKERS] User locks code Trond Eivind Glomsrød