On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The fundamental problem with bug tracking has been that the available
> > tools do not fit with our obviously successful mailing-list centered
> > development process. I certainly would consider it a distraction to
> > consult that tool to be able to participate in development.
>
> As usual, Thomas cuts to the heart of the matter ...
>
> The above is an accurate statement of the problem from a developer point
> of view. ISTM that what we're missing is a window into the process for
> people who are not following the mailing lists. While we have archives,
> searching the archives is not a great answer for a number of reasons
> (most notably that there's no mechanism to ensure that closure of a bug
> is recorded in the same thread(s) that report it).
>
> The trick for a bug database will be to provide a more coherent view
> without being a drag on our proven development process.
We're already working on it, lets not get this thread started again.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
