On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:37 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Greg Stark <st...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera > > > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > >> This email on the web: > > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/$MESSAGE_ID > > > > > fail :) > > > > It's a bad idea anyway. > > I find it useless, but why do you think it's a bad idea?
I would certainly like to have some idea behind why making accessing specific threads in the archives is a bad idea? > I had a look > at the mj2 source and I think the patch needed to make this work is a > one liner. So if we're interested it seems that it could be made to > work. > Cool. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 - Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
