While I'm looking at this thing... Why is tbm_add_page() not coded as a simple wrapper around tbm_mark_page_lossy()? As coded, it sometimes forces a whole bunch of pages *other than* the target page to become lossy too, which I cannot see a reason for it to be doing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
