Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/3/24 Tom Lane <t...@postgresql.org>:
>> catversion bumped because of change in GIN's pg_am entry, and because
>> the format of GIN indexes changed on-disk (there's a metapage now,
>> and possibly a pending list).
> Will this break pg_migrator?
No worse than it's already broken by hash indexes. I would imagine
the strategy will just be to force a REINDEX on any non-btree indexes.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
