On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:48 PM, hubert depesz lubaczewski <[email protected]> wrote: > I would love to get it, but when I suggested it some time in the past > Tom shot it down as bad idea. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
I agree with Tom here. I tracked a lot of idle in transaction problems and you need the whole sequence of queries of all the backends to really understand what happens. The last query executed is mostly useless to solve this sort of problem. At least, it was for me in every case I had to deal with. -- Guillaume -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
