Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Well, as you, I was hoping for a clear solution, and it seems we don't > > > have one. I think the false-positives problem is real and might make > > > the greater code coverage of the buildfarm worse than what we did for > > > 8.3. > > > > Huh? What false positive problem? > > typedefs listed on platforms that match identifiers in our code that are > _not_ typedefs.
Does this actually happen anywhere? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
