Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> "Dwayne Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> As mlw said, porting Postgres to run natively on Windows would be a
> significant effort. The forking mechanism it uses currently would
> have to be completely rearchitected. The buffer, file manager, and
> networking code would have to be rewritten. Off the top of my head,
> for a top programmer who is an expert in Unix, Windows, and Postgres,
> it might take a year.
IIRC someone had the backend working in multithreaded mode (actually
he had one of the forked backends doing it) as a part of some
java-driven backend.
>From the description of it it seemed that it did not take a full
man-year to get there ;)
------------------
Hannu
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
