* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > This isn't terribly compelling in this example, of course, but > it gets a lot more important when you've got a dozen of 'em.
Exactly.
> >From the perspective of the backend this is a simple and cheap change.
Awesome.
> I think the objection that is most likely to be raised is that it would
> confuse or break programs that analyze EXPLAIN output in any degree of
> detail. Of course such programs are going to need some work for 8.4
> already.
I definitely feel that it would be best to make this change now, when
we're introducing CTE as a type that anything doing EXPLAIN would need
to deal with at some level anyway than to add it later (eg: 8.5). I'm
definitely a +1 on this.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
