Gregory Stark <st...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Well, not that this is appropriate at this moment, but I had been considering
> proposing we do this to most of pg_proc and pg_operator. It's really quite a
> pain to maintain these files manually, especially pg_operator.
You won't get far with doing it to pg_proc: internal functions *have to*
have entries in there, else the fmgrtab infrastructure for them doesn't
get created. (Yeah, I suppose there are other ways to drive that, but
the fact remains that they need more than just a SQL command.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
