Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Stark <st...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm excited about some of them, but not to the point of not wanting to > >> ship beta. ?So +1 for removing them as per your suggestions. > > > I'm somewhat excited about posix_fadvise but my general feeling was > > that it was best to do nothing anyways. > > Yeah. One of the things in the back of my mind is that the planner is > going to prefer bitmap scans anyway for anything that fetches more than > a very few rows. So it's not clear that prefetching plain indexscans > is going to buy enough to justify a whole lotta work or ugliness there. > > I'm content to throw this one on TODO.
I am not inclined to add a TODO until we see actual value in doing it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
