Tom Lane wrote: > Well, if they're all in your search_path then plain old \df will do > fine. If they're not in your search path then I think it gets pretty > questionable whether they're "user defined" in a real sense. It seems > more likely that you've got a pile of modules loaded, and which of those > modules is "user defined" for your immediate purposes is something that > psql can't hope to intuit. >
I my environment schemas are used for namespace separation, so it doesn't make much sense to use search_path to pull everything back into a single namespace. Might as well use public for everything then. And these are not really modules, just ordinary user objects in separate namespaces. The main benefit of the U switch is that it enables to get a quick overview of whats deployed to the database. At the moment this is not possible as the *.* listings are polluted with system objects. PS. The original \dfU suggestion was made by you in http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/28027.1206976...@sss.pgh.pa.us. And seems, it didn't receive too much negative feedback then. regards, Martin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
