Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a >>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the >>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the >>> design decision to make). >> >> At this point I'd support that too.
> +1 Since there were no objections, and there is no time left before beta1, I'm going to go ahead and remove cardinality(). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers