On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 03:01:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <[email protected]> writes:
> > Tom,
> >> Like what?  I do not actually believe that anyone needs an
> >> interactive geographical timezone selector based on
> >> pg_timezone_names.
> 
> > Actually, considering that PostgreSQL is the leading open source
> > GIS database, I expect that a *lot* of people want this.
> 
> Surely we'd have seen more complaints, then.

You're setting a pretty high bar here for a pretty small change which
will cause a pretty large increase in convenience.  What is the actual
problem here?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: [email protected]

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to