Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 16:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Comments, objections, better ideas?
> Please, if you do this, make it optional.
I don't think making the plpgsql lexer pluggable is realistic.
> Potentially changing the behaviour of thousands of functions just to fix
> a rare bug will not endear us to our users. The bug may be something
> that people are relying on in some subtle way, ugly as that sounds.
That's why I don't want to change it in a minor release. In a major
release, however, it's fair game.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
