Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > \df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions > > \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions > > Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces? Like maybe: > > \df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions > > Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might > be adequate.
I suggested this to Bruce over IM: \df[antw][S+] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions (one line only, removing the second redundant line). This seems clea[nr]er to me. Bruce says it would confuse users. But really, if you can understand the [S+] stuff you should be able to get the [antw] stuff too, right? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
