Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> > \df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions
> > \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces? Like maybe:
>
> \df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might
> be adequate.
I suggested this to Bruce over IM:
\df[antw][S+] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions
(one line only, removing the second redundant line). This seems
clea[nr]er to me. Bruce says it would confuse users. But really, if
you can understand the [S+] stuff you should be able to get the [antw]
stuff too, right?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
