Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> > \df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions
> > \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces? Like maybe:
>
> \df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might
> be adequate.
Agreed. The problem is I don't see curly braces used anywhere in \?,
but now that I look at it it is just because there is no need for them.
How about this:
\\df{antw}[S+] [PATRN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
In a way though, they are really still optional, they are just not
optional for this specific line.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
