Heikki Linnakangas píše v čt 23. 04. 2009 v 10:22 +0300:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Comment and test case fixed.
Thanks
> I considered changing varstr_cmp to really
> return -1, 0 or 1, but I didn't because the behavior has been unchanged
> for ages and all the callers are happy with it. That's a heavily called
> function so any extra cycles there could make a difference.
I think keep it as it is good decision. strcmp() also does not guarantee
-1, 0, 1.
Zdenek
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
