Tom Lane wrote: > Not at all, because the database would be very unhappy at restart > if it can't find the checkpoint record pg_control is pointing to. >
So for several weeks now all postings just say how it will _not_ work. Does this boil down to "There's no way to make sure that a graceful failover won't lose data"? Regards, Andreas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
