On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:57:19AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Greg Stark wrote: >> I had previously considered adding an assertion in the backend to >> check they're sorted properly. That would be less formatting >> dependent and would be only a couple lines of C. >> >> I don't think we can do that with the gram.y check though. > > Well, the ordering in gram.y is just pro forma anyway. Checking that > all keywords are present and correctly labeled in kwlist.h is more > important. What's still missing is to check that all keywords > defined with "%token <keyword>" in gram.y are present in one of the > keyword lists. > > Hmm, it just occurred to me that this script is only a few steps > away from actually generating kwlist.h from gram.y, instead of > merely cross-checking them.
Single Point of Truth is good :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
