Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Ick. Is it possible that the postmaster did get a report, but thought
it was normal session termination? If so, how could we distinguish?
If that were the case then it would not have the dead process still
listed as a live backend, ISTM, which it does.
The postmaster does not control the content of the pg_stat_activity
view.
Well, I'm not I know how to find out the answer to your question. I
could try attaching a debugger to the postmaster - if I knew where to
put a breakpoint.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
