Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes:
> Passes my tests, but I can't really reproduce the requirement to retry,
> so I haven't been able to test that part :(
The patch looks sane to me. If you want to test, perhaps reducing the
sleep to 1 msec or so would reproduce the need to go around the loop
more than once. (Don't forget to put the machine under additional
load, too.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
