On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:24:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> writes: > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:45:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > >> I'm all for moving to git, but not until at least the core folks are > >> more familiar with it and have been using it. > > > Which ones aren't familiar and haven't been using it for at least > > the past year? I count two. > > I'm not familiar with it, and neither is Bruce, and frankly that's > entirely sufficient reason not to change now. > > What was more or less agreed to at the developer's meeting was that > we would move towards git in an orderly fashion.
The rest have already been moving to it in "an orderly fashion," some for over than a year. > I'm thinking something like six months to a year before cutting over > the core repository. What would gate that? > If you'd like to accomplish something *useful* about this, how about > pestering git upstream to support diff -c output format? I've been pestering them :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
