On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 17:21 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > 
> > I don't think it does, please look again. 
> 
> Still looks ok to me. pgarch_ArchiverCopyLoop() loops until all ready 
> WAL segments have been archived (assuming no errors).

No, it doesn't now, though it did used to. line 440.

> >> Ok, we're good then I guess.
> > 
> > No, because as I said, if archive_command has been returning non-zero
> > then the archive will be incomplete.
> 
> Yes. You think that's wrong? How would you like it to behave, then? I 
> don't think you want the shutdown to wait indefinitely until all files 
> have been archived if there's an error.

The complaint was that we needed to run a manual step to synchronise the
pg_xlog directory on the standby. We still need to do that, even after
the patch has been committed because 2 cases are not covered, so what is
the point of the recent change? It isn't enough. It *might* be enough,
most of the time, but you have no way of knowing that is the case and it
is dangerous not to check.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to