Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <[email protected]> writes: >> # instrument the Windows shared memory reattachment problem? >> -- as much as I'd like to do this, the solution could be as bad as the >> problem; we'd need more testing time for new instrumentation. Will have >> to deal with via testing patched versions. > > Yeah. That was put on the list a month ago, when there was still plenty > of time to do something about it; but since we missed getting it into > beta2 I think it will have to wait.
Agreed. I did some mucking around with it, but the parts I found reasonably easy to do were also reasonably useless :( //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
