Hi, On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: >> pg_standby can use ln command to restore an archived file, >> which might destroy the archived file as follows. > > Does it matter? pg_standby's source area wouldn't normally be an > "archive" in the real sense of the word, it's just a temporary staging > area between master and slave.
If so, it might be deleted after triggering the warm-standby. But, we cannot remove it because the latest xlog file which is required for normal recovery might exist in it. This is another undesirable scenario. Is this problem? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
