On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 20:30 -0700, Ron Mayer wrote: > What I'd find strange about "6.67 rows" in your example is more that on > the estimated rows side, it seems to imply an unrealistically precise estimate > in the same way that "667 rows" would seem unrealistically precise to me. > Maybe rounding to 2 significant digits would reduce confusion?
You're right that the number of significant digits already exceeds the true accuracy of the computation. I think what Robert wants to see is the exact value used in the calc, so the estimates can be checked more thoroughly than is currently possible. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
