On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 12:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > In any case, what we seem to have here is evidence that there are some > cases where the new default value of default_statistics_target is too > high and you can get a benefit by lowering it. I'm not sure we should > panic about that. Default values ought to be compromises. If people > only ever change the default in one direction then it's probably not a > very good compromise. We know that there are applications for which > 100 is still too low, so maybe now we have got the pain spread out > roughly evenly...
I'm certainly happy with 100 as the default. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
